Over 59026
politifake

Question Politics


REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT PARTY? -




YUP I TOLD YA - I'd get away with not having press conferences for 7 weeks




LIBERAL SOCK PUPPETS - tend to spam with repetitive politifakes and repetitive insults. Its all they know....




COUNTERFACTUALS -




ANY QUESTIONS? -




LOW INFORMATION VOTERS - Any questions as to why Democrats love them and need them?




LIBERALS AND TAXES - higher tax rates smothers growth, yet liberals say higher taxes is the answer. I would like to know what they think the freakin question is then!




intellectuals -




Leader Who? -




OBEY!!!!! -




QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WITH BARACK OBAMA -




A Patriot -




SILENCE THE OPPOSITION - When Liberals can't win an intellectual argument, this is their fallback position- silence any and all critics.




MEET THE SUPPRESSED - Hard-Hitting questions that is, when its time to interview his liberal guests.




I WANT YOU - To question your Government.




That is the Right Question. -


TAGS: global science false question warming
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by wsdpii

fauxnews - February 26, 2014, 11:35 am
http://www.politifake.org/comments/56375 X-D


question to atheist liberals -


TAGS: question
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by Curlyrocks

Curlyrocks - April 27, 2013, 4:23 pm
Just as a great leader its self is not a government, and a government too is designed to help subjugate people, in fact for better or worse thats usually its only job.
Renza - April 27, 2013, 3:40 pm
A deity is not in itself a religion. A religion is a man made construct of beliefs that typically are built around one or many supposed deities. It is also arguable that they are typically designed as a control mechanism to help subjugate the peoples.
ipaprime - April 27, 2013, 7:51 am
and there is no evidence that a being of power beyond what we can comprehend does not exist
Renza - April 25, 2013, 9:01 am
...It's fair to say there's reasonable evidence that it is false, whereas there is no evidence to suggest it exists beyond baseless speculation.
Renza - April 25, 2013, 9:00 am
Given that is in no way how a hypothesis works, your second attempt is much better. However, given that there is arguable evidence that the religion is stolen from misc sources, and it frequently contradicts itself, and uses physical impossibilities...
ipaprime - April 25, 2013, 8:54 am
or if you like, that which can neither be proven nor disproven MUST be held as a possibility
ipaprime - April 25, 2013, 8:52 am
but if I put forth a hypothisies and you can not disprove it then it must be true
Renza - April 25, 2013, 8:26 am
yeah, you have that backwards, something is nothing more than an idea or a baseless thought until there is some kind of evidence to back it. If the way reality works isn't good enough, you could always go based off the contradictions within the writings.
ipaprime - April 25, 2013, 8:06 am
then by your point since there is no scientific proof proving religion is fiction it is then fact. because if you can not disprove a premise it is true
Renza - April 23, 2013, 9:40 am
Ok, there is no tangible evidence in existence to prove that it is non fiction, therefore it is fiction and speculation until proof is found. That was easy. If you want specifics on yours in particular, I'm sure many people could provide.
ipaprime - April 23, 2013, 9:18 am
as you have said so do I call upon you to prove. prove religion is fiction
StoneTools - April 22, 2013, 9:30 pm
Numbering system is kind of a general term. Numbers date to around 30000 BC, negative numbers to around 100 BC, the Olmec used zero around the 4th century BC, complex numbers weren't used until Wessel described them in 1799
Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 22, 2013, 8:08 pm

Religion is fiction, Science is fact. Religion can be "invented" Science cannot.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 22, 2013, 8:04 pm

Many unconnected cultures used the concept of a number system, You're giving credit to one group for something several groups "invented"..There, You're wrong.
Renza - April 22, 2013, 10:06 am
I could be mistaken, but I believe that was already done... on a couple occasions... You just either didn't realize it, don't accept it, or won't admit it.
ipaprime - April 22, 2013, 8:42 am
ill be back soon don't worry about it. in the mean time I issues you the same challenge I issued moo. PROVE me wrong if you can
Renza - April 22, 2013, 8:37 am
Well, that or ran out of talking points.
Renza - April 22, 2013, 8:37 am
We've both told you, in quite reasonable detail at that, you got mad and quit responding.
ipaprime - April 22, 2013, 7:59 am
if you think I am wrong moo+ research it and tell us how I am wrong. if you have the courage and ability to do the research that is
Renza - April 21, 2013, 5:24 pm
If nothing else, it can be entertaining :)
Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 21, 2013, 3:22 pm

Don't waste your time. ipa won't listen to reason....He left Religifake when people disagreed with him....On second thought, Keep disagreeing with him.
Renza - April 21, 2013, 2:09 pm
Also, invented numbers, really? Must have been hard to do back before newton 'invented' gravity right? It's also a good thing the church helped out Galileo with his theories on the earth revolving around the sun right? Plus their care of Alexandria.
Renza - April 21, 2013, 2:03 pm
You were correct that we've been over this. The organizations of religion did not invent or predate science. Religious people from time to time have been positively involved in the progression of science, the organizations have not.
ipaprime - April 21, 2013, 3:00 am
summarien priests invented numbers, vedict priests the concept of 0, and Islamic scholars invented algebra. study a bit before you embarrass yourself again
Renza - April 20, 2013, 11:06 am
You could also say the world is flat. And regardless of whether any of us believed it to be fact, it would be inaccurate. science predates religion, especially modern religions.
ipaprime - April 20, 2013, 8:21 am
and as I have pointed out before religion begat science
Renza - April 19, 2013, 9:53 pm
Entirely reasonable arguments, while we dont (with exceptions on guns) ban either, there are measures that are or can be in place to protect people from the abusers of either - like background checks and anti-fraud laws. Strikes a reasonable balance imo.
terroraustralis - April 19, 2013, 8:47 pm
to me, freedom means trusting that on an open playing field, the truth will win against lies, law abiding citizens will win against criminals, and logic will win against superstition. and so far, freedom has worked well ever since it first appeared.
terroraustralis - April 19, 2013, 8:44 pm
i take the same stance with guns and free speech (specifically people who use it to spread lies), because if we can ban ONE thing that is abused by a minority of people, what reason do we have to not ban ALL things that are abused by a minority of people?
terroraustralis - April 19, 2013, 8:41 pm
agreed, in this age of fundamentalist terrorism and christian a**aults on seperation of church and state, its hard to live and let live. but just because a tiny minority abuse something doesnt mean it should be banned for everyone.
Renza - April 19, 2013, 5:30 pm
We've been discovering things, killing whoever discovered them and burning their knowledge, rediscovering, and repeating for ages. Obviously not entirely the fault of any one thing, but there is at least one major contributor.
Renza - April 19, 2013, 5:27 pm
Keep in mind though, the vast majority of scientific discoveries through the renaissance, and many for long after, were things people already knew long before that. The destruction of anything that detracted from god, like science, had a big hand in that
PapaFox - April 19, 2013, 4:30 pm
the clergy, mostly via the monasteries. Certainly religious intolerance has been a source of considerable ignorance and bloodshed over the years, but whether overall it's a net negative or net positive can be debated ad infinitum.
PapaFox - April 19, 2013, 4:29 pm
More than just a few. Remember that the vast majority of scientific discoveries made through the Renaissance, the Enlightenment and beyond were made by theists. And remember that the primary source of literacy in the West after the fall of Rome was ...
Curlyrocks - April 19, 2013, 3:43 pm
Wo, You kinda just blew my mind there. I mean there are obvious exceptions to any rule, Nazi Germany and commie Russia, and there must be good politicans and religions (but I can't think of any off the top of my head.)
Renza - April 19, 2013, 3:01 pm
When weighed against the atrocities and oppression it's brought about throughout history that is.
Renza - April 19, 2013, 2:59 pm
Yeah, there have been a few religious people who defied the norms and sought out higher learning. Just as there are some politicians that aren't simply self serving. Can you really say that religion has benefited the human race as a whole though?
PapaFox - April 19, 2013, 2:52 pm
Let's not over-generalize. For example, the guy who first theorized what came to known as the Big Bang, Georges LemaƮtre, was an astronomer, physicist... and Catholic priest. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre
Renza - April 19, 2013, 2:50 pm
Generally speaking, a**istance from religion and government are inverse of each other. The organization of government sometimes offers aid, while politicians just suck. The organization of religion often sucks, whereas the individuals sometimes offer aid
Curlyrocks - April 19, 2013, 2:33 pm
Well some one gets it. Good job terroraustralis.
Curlyrocks - April 19, 2013, 2:28 pm
Papa as I said in the poster I am also an atheist so it's directed to anyone who is both a liberal and an atheist.
Curlyrocks - April 19, 2013, 2:26 pm
"from time to time actually helps people out". and Religion doesn't, Mother Theresa? I hate the institutions that are meant to help but oppress, but it's all dependent on the individuals who make and run these institutions.
Renza - April 19, 2013, 12:03 pm
Plus those who sought educational and scientific advancement.
Renza - April 19, 2013, 11:58 am
Yeah, religion did wonders for Rome, plus everyone who got to enjoy the inquisitions, and everyone throughout the ages who have followed differing religions.
ipaprime - April 19, 2013, 11:46 am
where I have lived they have been plentiful
ipaprime - April 19, 2013, 11:45 am
those who belittle religion show a willful ignorance of history
Renza - April 19, 2013, 10:14 am
Overall correct, though a system that specifically tells you to go out and hurt people in one way or another or do things that hurt the overall progression of the species like demonizing knowledge, thought, and free will, is a bit destructive by nature.
StoneTools - April 19, 2013, 10:12 am
It's a two edged sword. People who are anti-religion fit the same mold as you stated.
terroraustralis - April 19, 2013, 10:10 am
maybe the the problem isnt religion, or politics, maybe its the power hungry a**holes who corrupt the system for their own gain. religious beleif never hurt anyone, its what people DO with it that hurts others. its basically the same as guns...
PapaFox - April 19, 2013, 10:04 am
Evangelical atheists being the ones who try to force their points of view on other people in the same annoying manner as evangelical Christians. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=evangelical%20atheist
Renza - April 19, 2013, 10:01 am
I've known religious people that don't go around trying to push their religion on everyone or try to have their beliefs/morals forced onto others. They're quite tolerable people, often few and far between depending where you're at though.
Renza - April 19, 2013, 9:58 am
You may believe what you will. I say greed for power is often less detrimental than willful ignorance.
StoneTools - April 19, 2013, 9:46 am
Evangelical atheists? You are kidding, right? That's like saying blue things that are orange.
PapaFox - April 19, 2013, 9:44 am
I have no problem with atheists who are like that either. But I will admit I get just as irritated at evangelical atheists as I get at evangelical Christians.
ipaprime - April 19, 2013, 8:40 am
you evidently are not a student of history
ipaprime - April 19, 2013, 8:39 am
as was stated those who rant and rave about the "evils" of religion and want to destroy it. I have known atheists who just ignored the whole good vs evil debate on religion and let other people live their lives as they wished
Renza - April 19, 2013, 7:53 am
A possible answer is that our society is currently dependent upon government, which unlike religion, is not only plausibly fixable, but from time to time actually helps people out. Side note, that font/color and background do not go well together.
PapaFox - April 19, 2013, 6:41 am
Anybody who isn't part of the religious right?
Cannabal - April 19, 2013, 2:12 am
Um, who are these "atheist liberals " now?


well....? -




Lineup -




What Did The President Know -




before the forum -


TAGS: softball questions
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JohnGalt

ElevenBlavo - September 8, 2016, 6:27 pm
"This is how much of you they will find after you have been found to commit suicide. So tell me again how you are going to blame Trump for what I did."


question -




If..... -




COUNTERFACTUALS -




COUNTERFACTUALS -




COUNTERFACTUALS -




Numbers Don't Lie -




BAGGAGE CLAIM -




the press -




PREV PAGE